tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-42411024073036482632024-03-13T11:47:18.236-07:00Election Bits and $nipetsElection Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.comBlogger299125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-14719554062948852282013-03-22T06:59:00.000-07:002013-03-22T06:59:59.697-07:00Ron Paul: The Fed and Congress Must Return to Fiscal and Monetary SanityRon Paul: The Fed and Congress Must Return to Fiscal and Monetary Sanity
Leave a response
by RonPaul.com on March 21, 2013
The Federal Reserve announced on Wednesday that it will continue its easy credit policies – to no one’s surprise. But its statements on fiscal policy are confusing and contradictory.
While the Fed has for several years criticized Congress’ inability to get its fiscal house in order – ignoring its own responsibility in enabling the government’s massive deficits and debt – the Fed is now alarmed about the across-the-board sequestration “cuts.” But the cuts that so worry Bernanke are not even real cuts, as, under sequestration, the Federal budget will still increase by trillions of dollars over the next ten years.
The Fed’s third round of quantitative easing amounts to asset purchases of $85 billion per month, yet the federal government cutting $44 billion* over one fiscal year is considered “restrictive fiscal policy” that might slow economic growth and job creation. One month of Fed money-printing undoes more than a year’s worth of sequestration, yet Chairman Bernanke expects us to believe that “monetary policy cannot offset a fiscal restraint of that magnitude.”
If $44 billion can’t be eliminated without raising alarm, then getting to long-term fiscal stability, as Chairman Bernanke frequently exhorts Congress to do, can never happen.
The Fed, on the one hand, says that the economy needs fiscal stability, while with the other hand it enables profligate government spending. Just since the beginning of the year, the Fed has purchased nearly half of the federal government’s monthly deficits as part of quantitative easing. During QE2, the Fed bought $770 billion of government debt. It has kept interest rates near zero for six years now, giving the government a free ride on the backs of savers and those who have been responsible with their money.
The Fed’s power over the dollar enables the government to keep spending and paying its debts with cheapened, devalued, debased dollars. And the American people suffer the consequences of high prices, distortions in the marketplace, and the aftermath of burst economic bubbles created by easy credit. It’s well past time to return to fiscal and monetary sanity. The Fed and Congress should be ashamed.
*According to the CBO, the sequester only reduces spending by $44 billion this year, with the rest of the reported $85 billion in cuts taking place in future years.
Source<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RVq0GoBUhlM/UUxjq2zI8yI/AAAAAAAAAfo/P6krDRpsZjE/s1600/f27.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RVq0GoBUhlM/UUxjq2zI8yI/AAAAAAAAAfo/P6krDRpsZjE/s320/f27.jpg" /></a>Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-75121274616744140892012-11-06T20:02:00.000-08:002012-11-06T20:03:47.588-08:00Tense race finds Obama firewall holdingy ALEXANDER BURNS | 11/6/12 4:14 PM EST Updated: 11/6/12 10:48 PM EST
Early election returns and exit polls held encouraging signs for Democrats Tuesday night, as President Barack Obama appeared to be holding steady or slightly ahead of Mitt Romney in the largest presidential swing states.
Romney, whose aides predicted a runaway victory of over 300 Electoral College votes in recent days, was deadlocked with Obama in the essential states of Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina and Florida — all of which he must win in order to capture the presidency.
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-EOLuvWN0TrI/UJndSxxFPpI/AAAAAAAAAfU/bsf6la5RROs/s1600/cafe3001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left:1em; margin-right:1em"><img border="0" height="217" width="400" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-EOLuvWN0TrI/UJndSxxFPpI/AAAAAAAAAfU/bsf6la5RROs/s400/cafe3001.jpg" /></a></div>
Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-26179965748287539122011-10-01T20:20:00.000-07:002011-10-01T20:22:09.943-07:002011<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-RSVnD0dlzJI/TofYu7qyodI/AAAAAAAAAfI/W8YqMC52yVM/s1600/obey34.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 301px; height: 400px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-RSVnD0dlzJI/TofYu7qyodI/AAAAAAAAAfI/W8YqMC52yVM/s400/obey34.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5658729757617070546" /></a>Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-45996619292873325052011-06-25T10:33:00.000-07:002011-06-25T10:36:50.852-07:00Incendiary- The Willingham Case<iframe width="560" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/P8Psb5t7RTI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-34779374726103449672011-06-04T21:23:00.001-07:002011-06-04T21:24:47.598-07:00Ron Paul for President<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tEMKr6xqCHg/TesE7lrl-bI/AAAAAAAAAfA/BK0X9PAIbrs/s1600/ronPaul.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 380px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tEMKr6xqCHg/TesE7lrl-bI/AAAAAAAAAfA/BK0X9PAIbrs/s400/ronPaul.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5614586782221203890" /></a><br /><br /><br />While President Obama defeated each potential Republican contender, Mr. Paul, who announced the formation of his presidential exploratory committee late last month, came closest to defeating the Democratic president. Mr. Paul, the favored candidate of the tea party movement, trails the president by only seven points (52 to 45 percent) in a hypothetical general election showdown.Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-58028913527282223662011-06-04T11:18:00.000-07:002011-06-04T11:27:11.002-07:00Operation Geronimo<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8MnOLduOkN8/Tep4GpNerjI/AAAAAAAAAe4/tN4kIlZvkXc/s1600/b84.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 264px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8MnOLduOkN8/Tep4GpNerjI/AAAAAAAAAe4/tN4kIlZvkXc/s400/b84.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5614431941007683122" /></a>Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-12899942669321966622011-05-02T19:20:00.000-07:002011-05-02T19:24:23.210-07:00The Compound being watched.<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-LahBvYeKXAA/Tb9mwc2wnVI/AAAAAAAAAek/UOJe6-zD7eQ/s1600/compound5.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 225px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-LahBvYeKXAA/Tb9mwc2wnVI/AAAAAAAAAek/UOJe6-zD7eQ/s400/compound5.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5602309444037811538" /></a><br /><br />President Obama and his administrative and national security officials receive updates about the attack on Osama bin Laden<br /><br /><br /><br />(CNN) -- As special-operations military troops prepared for a firefight about 7,000 miles away, President Barack Obama entered a room in the Washington area early in the afternoon on Sunday to follow along.<br /><br />Like a page plucked from a Hollywood screenplay, Obama and other principal coordinators for the mission that killed Osama bin Laden convened in order to remotely monitor the situation, John Brennan, the U.S. counterterrorism chief, said in a White House news briefing on Monday.<br /><br />Obama arrived after many of the mission's leaders had assembled there, but the president joined before the attack on bin Laden's mansion in Abbottabad, Pakistan, began, Brennan said.<br /><br />"We were able to monitor on a real-time basis the progress of the operation, from its commencement, to its time on target, to the extraction of the remains," Brennan said. "We were able to have regular updates to ensure that we had real-time visibility into the progress of the operation."<br /><br />The White House and Central Intelligence Agency didn't have access to a live audio feed, but they were able to tap other communications, a U.S. official told CNN. There was some live video, though the official declined to elaborate on the nature of that footage.<br /><br />The Los Angeles Times reported that the CIA had led the bin Laden attack operation, and officials on the 7th floor of the agency's Langley, Virginia, headquarters had access to live video of the raid, the report said.<br /><br />Brennan declined to say whether they had access to a video feed or radio communications. A White House spokesman declined to comment.<br /><br />Google, Apple and other Internet companies have mastered the process of streaming live video from events to the world. But that task would get much trickier if the cameramen are also carrying rifles and broadcasting from an untested, faraway locale.<br /><br />After Obama had signed off on the operation, CIA Director Leon Panetta gave the official order around midday Sunday for the operation to commence, the Times reported.<br /><br />"We have rid the world of the most infamous terrorist of our time," Panetta said in a statement Monday. "We gave President Obama and his team accurate, relevant, timely intelligence -- providing the information and insight they needed at key points as this mission developed."<br /><br />The CIA had been tracking bin Laden and provided intelligence to the White House saying the agency was "confident" the terrorist leader was inside the Pakistan compound, Brennan said.<br /><br />"It was probably one of the most anxiety-filled periods of time, I think, in the lives of the people who were assembled here yesterday," Brennan said. "The minutes passed like days, and the president was very concerned about the security of our personnel. That was what was on his mind throughout."<br /><br />Shortly after taking office in 2009, Obama had directed Panetta "to make the killing or capture of bin Laden the top priority of our war against al Qaeda," the president said in his speech Sunday night. "We give thanks to the countless intelligence and counterterrorism professionals who've worked tirelessly to achieve this outcome. The American people do not see their work, nor know their names."<br /><br />However, Obama apparently does get to see their work as it's being carried out.Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-39027604247953103172011-05-02T19:16:00.000-07:002011-05-02T19:20:37.447-07:00The Compound<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-IG3I9y4qkn8/Tb9l1YK88KI/AAAAAAAAAec/T1QRzmQaqv0/s1600/compound.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 211px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-IG3I9y4qkn8/Tb9l1YK88KI/AAAAAAAAAec/T1QRzmQaqv0/s400/compound.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5602308429168046242" /></a><br /><br />The compound, within which Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden was killed, burns after it was attacked in Abbottabad, Pakistan in this still image taken from mobile phone video May 2.Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-63760466724684040622011-05-02T15:15:00.000-07:002011-05-02T15:19:45.524-07:002012 ELECTION CANCELLED.<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-tUPI47Vb8EI/Tb8tuRaFkkI/AAAAAAAAAeU/Q10Z0hDCIlk/s1600/obamalaugh.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 240px; height: 198px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-tUPI47Vb8EI/Tb8tuRaFkkI/AAAAAAAAAeU/Q10Z0hDCIlk/s400/obamalaugh.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5602246734442238530" /></a><br /> Obama Buoyed by 100 Percent Approval Rating <br /><br /> <br />WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report) – In what historians are calling an unprecedented development in American politics, both major parties decided today to cancel the 2012 election.<br /><br />The decision to scrap the 2012 contest came on the heels of a new poll showing President Barack Obama with an approval rating of one hundred percent, believed to be a record high for an American president.<br /><br />Mr. Obama even polled well among Republicans, with a majority of GOP voters agreeing with the statement, “I no longer care that he wasn’t born here.”<br /><br />The new bipartisan spirit sweeping the nation was captured well by House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), who tearfully told reporters, “This is a great day for America… oh, leave me alone, goddamn it.”<br /><br />Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump made no official announcement, but sources said he was considering running for Prime Minister of Canada.<br /><br />The cancellation of the election comes in the aftermath of the death of Osama bin Laden, whose last words reportedly were, “I knew I shouldn’t have signed up for Foursquare.”<br /><br />Of all the major news networks, Fox News did not report news of bin Laden’s death, saying that it would air cartoons “until further notice.”<br /><br />In Libya, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi issued the following official statement: “Uh-oh.”<br /><br />In North Korea, President Kim Jong-Il said this: “I have lost my last friend on Facebook.”<br /><br />And in Wasilla, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin said this: “We must find and kill Osama bin Laden.”Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-43749683605678974392011-01-15T14:08:00.000-08:002011-01-15T14:09:49.548-08:00Wiki Leaking Strikes Again....<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TTIbDs9DgmI/AAAAAAAAAeE/PiDsUjGC0OY/s1600/batman11.jpeg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 283px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TTIbDs9DgmI/AAAAAAAAAeE/PiDsUjGC0OY/s400/batman11.jpeg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5562538240176783970" /></a>Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-20157573501172572742010-12-15T05:54:00.000-08:002010-12-15T05:55:58.874-08:00Is there a Santa Claus<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TQjIpWbJEEI/AAAAAAAAAd4/a-LpET1NACE/s1600/santapolitics.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 359px; height: 300px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TQjIpWbJEEI/AAAAAAAAAd4/a-LpET1NACE/s400/santapolitics.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5550907153453748290" /></a>Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-85629853710165053322010-12-12T18:20:00.000-08:002010-12-12T18:22:10.544-08:00Former President Bush.<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TQWDNyLO_MI/AAAAAAAAAdw/NtsMmdtaiR0/s1600/ariot.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 267px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TQWDNyLO_MI/AAAAAAAAAdw/NtsMmdtaiR0/s400/ariot.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5549986388634434754" /></a>Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-90032437259095705252010-12-11T03:12:00.000-08:002010-12-11T03:13:56.013-08:00Wiki Leaking...wow.<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TQNc5hm5H2I/AAAAAAAAAdo/xN3QzohRTN4/s1600/awikileaks.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 271px; height: 400px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TQNc5hm5H2I/AAAAAAAAAdo/xN3QzohRTN4/s400/awikileaks.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5549381309194379106" /></a>Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-68075151448725209792010-10-30T14:52:00.000-07:002010-10-30T14:54:01.454-07:00Obamadoor.<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TMyT0xJzRQI/AAAAAAAAAdg/PYqemzmG3LI/s1600/obamadoor.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 381px; height: 400px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TMyT0xJzRQI/AAAAAAAAAdg/PYqemzmG3LI/s400/obamadoor.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533960576888423682" /></a><br />Obama prepares for his scariest Halloween in office, as the Republicans come knocking...<br /><br />Anger, fear as elections near<br /><br />The impact will be felt Tuesday. Republicans are poised to reap the benefits of the enormous dissatisfaction with the status quo. How deeply and how broadly remains for the voters to decide, but there is little doubt that the outcome will change the balance of power in Washington.Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-61850659029943838952010-10-21T15:05:00.000-07:002010-10-21T15:08:44.039-07:00The Money Changers..some things change and they also stay the same.<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TMC5PiKv4xI/AAAAAAAAAdY/ITXPNMrnUxU/s1600/jpm.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 286px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TMC5PiKv4xI/AAAAAAAAAdY/ITXPNMrnUxU/s400/jpm.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5530624018932032274" /></a><br /><br />In every dark hour of our national life a leadership of frankness and vigor has met with that understanding and support of the people themselves which is essential to victory. I am convinced that you will again give that support to leadership in these critical days. In such a spirit on my part and on yours we face our common difficulties. They concern, thank God, only material things. Values have shrunken to fantastic levels: taxes have risen, our ability to pay has fallen, government of all kinds is faced by serious curtailment of income, the means of exchange are frozen in the currents of trade, the withered leaves of industrial enterprise lie on every side, farmers find no markets for their produce, the savings of many years in thousands of families are gone.<br /><br />More important, a host of unemployed citizens face the grim problem of existence, and an equally great number toil with little return. Only a foolish optimist can deny the dark realities of the moment.<br /><br />Yet our distress comes from no failure of substance. We are stricken by no plague of locusts. Compared with the perils which our forefathers conquered because they believed and were not afraid, we have still much to be thankful for. Nature still offers her bounty and human efforts have multiplied it. Plenty is at our doorstep, but a generous use of it languishes in the very sight of the supply.<br /><br />Primarily, this is because the rulers of the exchange of mankind's goods have failed through their own stubbornness and their own incompetence, have admitted their failures and abdicated. Practices of the unscrupulous money changers stand indicted in the court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of men.<br /><br />True, they have tried, but their efforts have been cast in the pattern of an outworn tradition. Faced by failure of credit, they have proposed only the lending of more money.<br /><br />Stripped of the lure of profit by which to induce our people to follow their false leadership, they have resorted to exhortations, pleading tearfully for restored conditions. They know only the rules of a generation of self-seekers.<br /><br />They have no vision, and when there is no vision the people perish.<br /><br />The money changers have fled their high seats in the temple of our civilization. We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths. <br /><br />The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit.<br /><br />Happiness lies not in the mere possession of money, it lies in the joy of achievement, in the thrill of creative effort.<br /><br />The joy and moral stimulation of work no longer must be forgotten in the mad chase of evanescent profits. These dark days will be worth all they cost us if they teach us that our true destiny is not to be ministered unto but to minister to ourselves and to our fellow-men. <br /><br />By F.D.R.Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-23289804889076451742010-10-18T17:29:00.000-07:002010-10-18T17:53:39.140-07:00"Where is the Payoff for Huge Pentagon Budget Hikes?"<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TLzmkX4OZpI/AAAAAAAAAdQ/KJ4PIdk2D8A/s1600/the+pentagon.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 262px; height: 193px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TLzmkX4OZpI/AAAAAAAAAdQ/KJ4PIdk2D8A/s400/the+pentagon.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5529547955063645842" /></a><br /><br />Since 2001, Congress has given the Pentagon more than $1 trillion to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Over the same period, Congress and the Pentagon have added a second trillion dollars to the nonwar (base) part of the Pentagon budget. You'd think all that added money would give us larger forces, a newer hardware inventory and better trained people. Instead, the windfall made our forces smaller, older and less ready to fight.<br /><br />A rare few in Congress have begun to notice that more money has bought less defense. They portend a major shift in the consensus on defense spending. The coming change is a byproduct of the realization that the Pentagon is an integral part of a federal government with spending that is out of control. The Pentagon and the majority of champions of higher defense budgets in conservative think tanks and Congress are trying to head off the coming cuts with seemingly dramatic, but substantively feeble, initiatives. Here are the facts underlying the need for real reforms.<br /><br />At $707 billion, the defense budget is today higher than it has ever been since the end of World War II. That statement has been true since 2007; under the Gates plan, it will remain so out to the year 2020 if war spending stays constant. This spending level is unrelated to the military threat. During the Cold War, from 1948 to 1990, when we faced the sizeable forces of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact, annual Pentagon spending averaged $440 billion in inflation-adjusted dollars. Today, big spending advocates point to China as the future threat we must prepare for, but if we add the defense budgets of China, Russia, Iran, North Korea and Cuba together, and then double that sum, the Pentagon still spends substantially more.<br /><br />As to the current threat (terrorism), we almost certainly spend more in one day than the terrorists spend in an entire year. The size of our defense budget today is not the product of the external threat. It is the result of internal Pentagon dynamics, none of them healthy. Since 2000, Congress and presidents have funded the Pentagon with $7 trillion out to the year 2011. Of that amount, $1.3 trillion has been for the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. Thus, the nonwar parts of the Pentagon budget will have received $5.7 trillion.<br /><br />We can calculate what the Pentagon would have received for the same period in the absence of the wars and of any spending above inflation: $4.7 trillion. That means the Pentagon's "base" budget received a plus-up of almost $1 trillion for 2000-2011. What did the Pentagon and Congress do with this trillion-dollar windfall? The Navy budget received an additional $293 billion, 2011 funding increased over 2000 by 44 percent. Yet the size of the Navy's combat fleet dropped from 318 ships and submarines to 287, a decline of 10 percent. This is not a smaller, newer fleet; it is a smaller, older fleet - about four years older, on average, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Is it more ready to fight? Almost certainly not; for the past year, the press has repeatedly reported on severe maintenance problems throughout the fleet, and Navy combat pilot training in the air has remained at historic lows.<br /><br />The situation in the Air Force is worse. It received a windfall of $320 billion, an increase of 43 percent. During the same 2000-2011 period, the number of active and reserve fighter and bomber squadrons went from 146 to 72, a decline of 51 percent. Like the Navy, it's also older on average: According to CBO, it is now about nine years older and at a historic high of about 23 years. (Our aircraft are older than our ships.) Air Force budget data tell us that fighter pilot air training hours today are only one-half to one-third of what they were in the 1970s, an era not touted for high readiness.<br /><br />The so-called good news is from the Army. It received a plus up of $297 billion, a 53 percent increase. The number of brigade combat teams grew from 44 to 46, an increase of 5 percent. A 53 percent increase in money bought a 5 percent increase in combat forces. But still, CBO tells us that major Army equipment inventories are mostly older. More ready to fight? In 2006, the House Armed Services Committee held hearings and leaked a memo documenting historic lows in the readiness of active Army units. The analysis has not been publicly updated; we should worry that it has gotten worse, not better.<br /><br />In sum, an extra trillion dollars for the Pentagon has been processed into forces that are, with minor exceptions, smaller, older and less ready to fight. The defense management leadership in the Pentagon and Congress has squandered a trillion dollars. Those who recently have become politically active out of disgust with the mess in Washington should be particularly incensed over the Pentagon's horrific performance."Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-14143278189881528782010-10-18T17:08:00.000-07:002010-10-18T17:28:42.359-07:00Smaller, Older and Less Prepared Our Military. after Spending 2 Trillion.<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TLzj-3QLERI/AAAAAAAAAdI/yQHgR8BVD4Q/s1600/the+pentagon.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 262px; height: 193px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TLzj-3QLERI/AAAAAAAAAdI/yQHgR8BVD4Q/s400/the+pentagon.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5529545111627305234" /></a><br />Smaller, Older and Less Prepared <br />Where is the Payoff for Huge Pentagon Budget Hikes? ? ?<br />By WINSLOW T. WHEELER <br /><br />Since 2001, Congress has given the Pentagon more than $1 trillion to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Over the same period, Congress and the Pentagon have added a second trillion dollars to the nonwar (base) part of the Pentagon budget.<br /><br />You'd think all that added money would give us larger forces, a newer hardware inventory and better trained people. Instead, the windfall made our forces smaller, older and less ready to fight.<br /><br />A rare few in Congress have begun to notice that more money has bought less defense.<br /><br />They portend a major shift in the consensus on defense spending. The coming change is a byproduct of the realization that the Pentagon is an integral part of a federal government with spending that is out of control. The Pentagon and the majority of champions of higher defense budgets in conservative think tanks and Congress are trying to head off the coming cuts with seemingly dramatic, but substantively feeble, initiatives.<br /><br />Here are the facts underlying the need for real reforms.<br /><br />At $707 billion, the defense budget is today higher than it has ever been since the end of World War II. That statement has been true since 2007; under the Gates plan, it will remain so out to the year 2020 if war spending stays constant.<br /><br />This spending level is unrelated to the military threat. During the Cold War, from 1948 to 1990, when we faced the sizeable forces of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact, annual Pentagon spending averaged $440 billion in inflation-adjusted dollars. Today, big spending advocates point to China as the future threat we must prepare for, but if we add the defense budgets of China, Russia, Iran, North Korea and Cuba together, and then double that sum, the Pentagon still spends substantially more.<br /><br />As to the current threat (terrorism), we almost certainly spend more in one day than the terrorists spend in an entire year.<br /><br />The size of our defense budget today is not the product of the external threat. It is the result of internal Pentagon dynamics, none of them healthy.<br /><br />Since 2000, Congress and presidents have funded the Pentagon with $7 trillion out to the year 2011. Of that amount, $1.3 trillion has been for the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. Thus, the nonwar parts of the Pentagon budget will have received $5.7 trillion.<br /><br />We can calculate what the Pentagon would have received for the same period in the absence of the wars and of any spending above inflation: $4.7 trillion. That means the Pentagon's "base" budget received a plus-up of almost $1 trillion for 2000-2011.<br /><br />What did the Pentagon and Congress do with this trillion-dollar windfall? The Navy budget received an additional $293 billion, 2011 funding increased over 2000 by 44 percent. Yet the size of the Navy's combat fleet dropped from 318 ships and submarines to 287, a decline of 10 percent.<br /><br />This is not a smaller, newer fleet; it is a smaller, older fleet - about four years older, on average, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Is it more ready to fight? Almost certainly not; for the past year, the press has repeatedly reported on severe maintenance problems throughout the fleet, and Navy combat pilot training in the air has remained at historic lows.<br /><br />The situation in the Air Force is worse. It received a windfall of $320 billion, an increase of 43 percent. During the same 2000-2011 period, the number of active and reserve fighter and bomber squadrons went from 146 to 72, a decline of 51 percent. Like the Navy, it's also older on average: According to CBO, it is now about nine years older and at a historic high of about 23 years.<br /><br />(Our aircraft are older than our ships.)<br /><br />Air Force budget data tell us that fighter pilot air training hours today are only one-half to one-third of what they were in the 1970s, an era not touted for high readiness.<br /><br />The so-called good news is from the Army. It received a plus up of $297 billion, a 53 percent increase. The number of brigade combat teams grew from 44 to 46, an increase of 5 percent. A 53 percent increase in money bought a 5 percent increase in combat forces.<br /><br />But still, CBO tells us that major Army equipment inventories are mostly older. More ready to fight? In 2006, the House Armed Services Committee held hearings and leaked a memo documenting historic lows in the readiness of active Army units. The analysis has not been publicly updated; we should worry that it has gotten worse, not better.<br /><br />In sum, an extra trillion dollars for the Pentagon has been processed into forces that are, with minor exceptions, smaller, older and less ready to fight.<br /><br />The defense management leadership in the Pentagon and Congress has squandered a trillion dollars.<br /><br />Those who recently have become politically active out of disgust with the mess in Washington should be particularly incensed over the Pentagon's horrific performance.<br /><br />Winslow T. Wheeler spent 31 years working on Capitol Hill with senators from both political parties and the Government Accountability Office, specializing in national security affairs. Currently, he directs the Straus Military Reform Project of the Center for Defense Information in Washington.Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-81248258770980543172010-10-15T06:15:00.000-07:002010-10-15T06:27:03.529-07:00Katrina,8-29-2005, i prayed --God You saved The Chilean Miners where were you during Katrina ?<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TLhWTmcFDMI/AAAAAAAAAdA/HFC8-5x5wZU/s1600/hurricane-katrina-superdome.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 275px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TLhWTmcFDMI/AAAAAAAAAdA/HFC8-5x5wZU/s400/hurricane-katrina-superdome.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5528263437333105858" /></a><br /><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/E2FlcRVTuCA?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/E2FlcRVTuCA?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object><br /><br />Oh Yeah ..God answered my prayer ..very quickly....the answer was .. Where were you ?..Nuff said.Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-1715913790675393982010-10-14T05:43:00.000-07:002010-10-14T06:05:02.897-07:00Goldwater,the John Birch Society, and Me.<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TLb_bAQ4PeI/AAAAAAAAAc4/gbrb-ns5x_Q/s1600/Bckly-Rgn.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 269px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TLb_bAQ4PeI/AAAAAAAAAc4/gbrb-ns5x_Q/s400/Bckly-Rgn.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5527886432036208098" /></a><br /><br />Goldwater, the John Birch Society, and Me<br />William F. Buckley, Jr.<br /><br />March 2008<br /><br /><br />"Goldwater, the John Birch Society, and Me"<br /><br /><br />In the early months of l962, there was restiveness in certain political quarters of the Right. The concern was primarily the growing strength of the Soviet Union, and the reiteration by its leaders of their designs on the free world. Some of the actors keenly concerned felt that Senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona was a natural leader in the days ahead.<br /><br />But it seemed inconceivable that an anti-establishment gadfly like Goldwater could be nominated as the spokesman-head of a political party. And it was embarrassing that the only political organization in town that dared suggest this radical proposal—the GOP’s nominating Goldwater for President—was the John Birch Society.<br /><br />The society had been founded in 1958 by an earnest and capable entrepreneur named Robert Welch, a candy man, who brought together little clusters of American conservatives, most of them businessmen. He demanded two undistracted days in exchange for his willingness to give his seminar on the Communist menace to the United States, which he believed was more thoroughgoing and far-reaching than anyone else in America could have conceived. His influence was near-hypnotic, and his ideas wild. He said Dwight D. Eisenhower was a “dedicated, conscious agent of the Communist conspiracy,” and that the government of the United States was “under operational control of the Communist party.” It was, he said in the summer of 1961, “50-70 percent” Communist-controlled.<br /><br />Welch refused to divulge the size of the society’s membership, though he suggested it was as high as 100,000 and could reach a million. His method of organization caused general alarm. The society comprised a series of cells, no more than twenty people per cell. It was said that its members were directed to run in secret for local offices and to harass school boards and librarians on the matter of the Communist nature of the textbooks and other materials they used.<br /><br />The society became a national cause célèbre—so much so, that a few of those anxious to universalize a draft-Goldwater movement aiming at a nomination for President in 1964 thought it best to do a little conspiratorial organizing of their own against it.<br /><br />_____________<br /><br /> <br /><br />In January of that year I had a telephone call from William Baroody. It was, he said, a matter of great national importance that I spend Tuesday and Wednesday of the following week with Senator Goldwater in Palm Beach, Florida. I would be one of three—along with Russell Kirk, the philosopher and author of the seminal 1953 text The Conservative Mind, and public-relations man Jay Hall, who had represented General Motors in Washington. I said I could be there up until 5 p.m. on day one and all of day two. I had a speaking date in St. Augustine on the first night. Baroody simply repeated that the meeting was very important.<br /><br />Baroody was the head of the American Enterprise Institute, a right-wing think tank founded in 1943. We had met only cursorily, though I knew him to be an influential figure in behind-the-scenes conservative politics. He was invigorated by meetings with small groups, which he much enjoyed dominating. It was clear that he greatly aspired to be important to Goldwater, and perhaps to a Goldwater White House.<br /><br />_____________<br /><br /> <br /><br />I arrived at breakfast with the other invitees at the imposing Breakers Hotel and ventilated the critical point: were we here assembled to answer Goldwater’s questions, or to proffer advice on the presidential campaign two years ahead? If the latter, this had to mean that Goldwater had resolved to enter the campaign, which would be big news: so far, he had steadfastly declined to take that step.<br /><br />Baroody, by nature domineering, was emphatic on the subject. Under no circumstances should anything be said touching on a presidential campaign, inasmuch as Goldwater had not himself decided whether to run and did not want to spend time discussing the issue.<br /><br />Russell Kirk was not prepared simply to leave the matter closed. “What is more important,” he asked Baroody, “than to try to get Goldwater elected President?”<br /><br />Baroody was obliged to agree that this would be a wonderful national achievement. “But he has said no.”<br /><br />“They always say no,” I volunteered.<br /><br />“Bill, he has said no on at least five different occasions. If he thought we were going to spend the day on that subject, he would just walk away.”<br /><br />Kirk objected. “I’m the least experienced politically of the people in this room. But I’ve seen the polls—we’ve all seen the polls—and Bill has a point: why should we shrink from telling him that’s what he ought to do?”<br /><br />It required someone of Kirk’s arrant innocence in consorting with brute political forces to make his point so insistently. He let go of it only after Baroody promised that he would seek out, some time later, an opportunity for Russell to argue it personally with Goldwater. “Maybe you can tell him something about William Pitt that will change his mind.”<br /><br />Kirk smiled. “Very well. So what do you have in mind for us?”<br /><br />“We’ll have to coast on that.”<br /><br />_____________<br /><br /> <br /><br />Goldwater was in Palm Beach visiting, incognito, with a sister-in-law who was resident there. He arrived at our hotel suite at about 11:00 in extravagantly informal garb, cowboy hat and dark glasses, a workman’s blue shirt, and denim jeans, together with his beloved Western boots. He did bring along a weather-beaten briefcase, though I never noticed his opening it the whole day.<br /><br />What followed was an hour of general discussion on the policies of President Kennedy and the failure of the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba. Baroody noted Kennedy’s surprising drop in the polls: 61 percent of the public thought he spent money too freely, a third thought him unduly weak in opposing Soviet challenges in Berlin and elsewhere.<br /><br />Moving on, Baroody brought up the John Birch Society. It was quickly obvious that this was the subject Goldwater wished counsel on.<br /><br />Kirk, unimpeded by his little professorial stutter, greeted the subject with fervor. It was his opinion, he said emphatically, that Robert Welch was a man disconnected from reality. How could anyone reason, as Welch had done in The Politician, that President Eisenhower had been a secret agent of the Communists? This mischievous unreality was a great weight on the back of responsible conservative political thinking. The John Birch Society should be renounced by Goldwater and by everyone else—Kirk turned his eyes on me—with any influence on the conservative movement.<br /><br />But that, Goldwater said, is the problem. Consider this, he exaggerated: “Every other person in Phoenix is a member of the John Birch Society. Russell, I’m not talking about Commie-haunted apple pickers or cactus drunks, I’m talking about the highest cast of men of affairs. Any of you know who Frank Cullen Brophy is?”<br /><br />I raised my hand. “I spent a lot of time with him. He was going to contribute capital to help found National Review. He didn’t.” Brophy was a prominent Arizona banker.<br /><br />Goldwater said he knew nothing about that, but added that Brophy certainly was aware of Goldwater’s personal enthusiasm for the magazine and especially for its Washington editor, Brent Bozell. “Why isn’t Brent here?” he turned to Baroody.<br /><br />“He’s in Spain.”<br /><br />“Well, our—my—Conscience of a Conservative continues to sell.” Bozell, who was also my brother-in-law, had ghostwritten the book, which had given Goldwater a national profile.<br /><br />Kirk said he could not imagine Bozell disagreeing on the need to excommunicate the John Birch Society from the conservative movement.<br /><br />But this brought another groan from Goldwater. “You just can’t do that kind of thing in Arizona. For instance, who on earth can dismiss Frank Brophy from anything?”<br /><br />_____________<br /><br /> <br /><br />Time was given to the John Birch Society lasting through lunch, and the subject came up again the next morning. We resolved that conservative leaders should do something about the John Birch Society. An allocation of responsibilities crystallized.<br /><br />Goldwater would seek out an opportunity to dissociate himself from the “findings” of the Society’s leader, without, however, casting any aspersions on the Society itself. I, in National Review and in my other writing, would continue to expose Welch and his thinking to scorn and derision. “You know how to do that,” said Jay Hall.<br /><br />I volunteered to go further. Unless Welch himself disowned his operative fallacy, National Review would oppose any support for the society.<br /><br />“How would you define the Birch fallacy?” Jay Hall asked.<br /><br />“The fallacy,” I said, “is the assumption that you can infer subjective intention from objective consequence: we lost China to the Communists, therefore the President of the United States and the Secretary of State wished China to go to the Communists.”<br /><br />“I like that,” Goldwater said.<br /><br />What would Russell Kirk do? He was straightforward. “Me? I’ll just say, if anybody gets around to asking me, that the guy is loony and should be put away.”<br /><br />“Put away in Alaska?” I asked, mock-seriously. The wisecrack traced to Robert Welch’s expressed conviction, a year or so earlier, that the state of Alaska was being prepared to house anyone who doubted his doctrine that fluoridated water was a Communist-backed plot to weaken the minds of the American public.<br /><br /><br />About the Author<br /><br />William F. Buckley, Jr. is the founder and former editor-in-chief of National Review. TheElection Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-15955184553850147162010-10-14T05:39:00.000-07:002010-10-14T05:42:44.972-07:00William F. Buckly<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TLb6u6UuFQI/AAAAAAAAAcw/KWMsaj7SxCU/s1600/williamBuckly+Jr.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 240px; height: 275px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TLb6u6UuFQI/AAAAAAAAAcw/KWMsaj7SxCU/s400/williamBuckly+Jr.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5527881276480951554" /></a><br />Truth is a demure lady, much too ladylike to knock you on your head and drag you to her cave. She is there, but people must want her, and seek her out.<br />William F. Buckley, Jr.Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-26486294766511713102010-10-14T05:16:00.000-07:002010-10-14T05:36:16.905-07:00The John Birch Society, 1965<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TLb5LbxLMGI/AAAAAAAAAco/Ie2acSobdxQ/s1600/johnbirchsociety.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 300px; height: 300px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TLb5LbxLMGI/AAAAAAAAAco/Ie2acSobdxQ/s400/johnbirchsociety.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5527879567471751266" /></a><br /><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dg6ixwmcMcc?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dg6ixwmcMcc?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-48528792853724754252010-07-24T16:25:00.000-07:002010-07-24T16:44:57.142-07:00"There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on --shame on you. Fool me -- you<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TEt5SoH-CFI/AAAAAAAAAcQ/xdlhYx3nyaA/s1600/ageorgebush33.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 301px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TEt5SoH-CFI/AAAAAAAAAcQ/xdlhYx3nyaA/s400/ageorgebush33.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5497621131051272274" /></a><br /><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TEt2wKNOvxI/AAAAAAAAAcI/sBBUpWrgwQI/s1600/ageorgebush22.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 356px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TEt2wKNOvxI/AAAAAAAAAcI/sBBUpWrgwQI/s400/ageorgebush22.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5497618339881467666" /></a>Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-54884743855005195612010-07-22T14:13:00.000-07:002010-07-22T14:29:49.736-07:00Flashback : Audit the Fed bill watered down by the Senate. Thanks Senators for no help. Nothing changes.<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TEi4LsH4DaI/AAAAAAAAAcA/LBpr5aF9TfU/s1600/aronpaul888888.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 284px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TEi4LsH4DaI/AAAAAAAAAcA/LBpr5aF9TfU/s400/aronpaul888888.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5496845856167955874" /></a><br /><object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7II2diHymv4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7II2diHymv4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-60187993773402291022010-07-07T16:44:00.000-07:002010-07-07T16:46:25.296-07:00Texas Native Chickens<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TDURs-i5WNI/AAAAAAAAAb4/FK1ylasa5Yg/s1600/aperrychicken.gif"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 333px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TDURs-i5WNI/AAAAAAAAAb4/FK1ylasa5Yg/s400/aperrychicken.gif" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5491314785049467090" /></a>Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4241102407303648263.post-92052668287558069442010-07-05T21:24:00.000-07:002010-07-05T21:32:03.712-07:00When things go wrong it is not a Wall Street Problem.<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TDKxVoC0O9I/AAAAAAAAAbw/KQYWZRuMPY4/s1600/awallstreet888888.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 293px; height: 400px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TDKxVoC0O9I/AAAAAAAAAbw/KQYWZRuMPY4/s400/awallstreet888888.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5490645880802655186" /></a>
<br /><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TDKwnrLe3II/AAAAAAAAAbo/4vTpjqK5zwI/s1600/awallstreet888888.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 293px; height: 400px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_r4vKJr3NkO8/TDKwnrLe3II/AAAAAAAAAbo/4vTpjqK5zwI/s400/awallstreet888888.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5490645091370327170" /></a>
<br /><object id="cnbcplayer" height="380" width="400" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,0,0" >
<br /><param name="type" value="application/x-shockwave-flash"/>
<br /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"/>
<br /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"/>
<br /><param name="quality" value="best"/>
<br /><param name="scale" value="noscale" />
<br /><param name="wmode" value="transparent"/>
<br /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000"/>
<br /><param name="salign" value="lt"/>
<br /><param name="movie" value="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1526836676/code/cnbcplayershare"/>
<br /><embed name="cnbcplayer" PLUGINSPAGE="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000" height="380" width="400" quality="best" wmode="transparent" scale="noscale" salign="lt" src="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1526836676/code/cnbcplayershare" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" />
<br /></object>Election Bits and $nipetshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694755358638191400noreply@blogger.com0